CVE-2025-52479
Awaiting Analysis Awaiting Analysis - Queue
BaseFortify

Publication date: 2025-06-25

Last updated on: 2025-06-26

Assigner: GitHub, Inc.

Description
HTTP.jl provides HTTP client and server functionality for Julia, and URIs.jl parses and works with Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs). URIs.jl prior to version 1.6.0 and HTTP.jl prior to version 1.10.17 allows the construction of URIs containing CR/LF characters. If user input was not otherwise escaped or protected, this can lead to a CRLF injection attack. Users of HTTP.jl should upgrade immediately to HTTP.jl v1.10.17, and users of URIs.jl should upgrade immediately to URIs.jl v1.6.0. The check for valid URIs is now in the URI.jl package, and the latest version of HTTP.jl incorporates that fix. As a workaround, manually validate any URIs before passing them on to functions in this package.
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
Probability:
Percentile:
Meta Information
Published
2025-06-25
Last Modified
2025-06-26
Generated
2026-05-07
AI Q&A
2025-06-25
EPSS Evaluated
2026-05-05
NVD
Affected Vendors & Products
Currently, no data is known.
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-113 The product receives data from an HTTP agent/component (e.g., web server, proxy, browser, etc.), but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CR and LF characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers.
CWE-93 The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs.
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?

This vulnerability involves the Julia packages URIs.jl and HTTP.jl allowing the construction of URIs containing unescaped Carriage Return and Line Feed (CR/LF) characters. This flaw enables attackers to perform CRLF injection attacks by embedding CRLF sequences in URIs, which can manipulate HTTP headers or requests. The vulnerability arises because the packages did not properly validate or reject CRLF characters in URIs before version 1.6.0 for URIs.jl and 1.10.17 for HTTP.jl. The fix hardens URI parsing by rejecting CRLF characters and raising errors if such characters are detected, preventing injection attacks. [1, 2]


How can this vulnerability impact me? :

This vulnerability can allow attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers or data into requests by exploiting CRLF injection. For example, an attacker can insert custom headers into HTTP requests, potentially leading to HTTP response splitting attacks or manipulation of server behavior. This can compromise the integrity of HTTP communications and may be used to bypass security controls or perform further attacks. [2]


How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?

You can detect this vulnerability by testing if your system or network allows URIs containing unescaped CR/LF characters that lead to CRLF injection. For example, you can attempt to send an HTTP request with embedded CRLF sequences in the URI to see if the server processes injected headers. A sample command in Julia is: ```julia import HTTP HTTP.get("http://localhost:1337/ HTTP/1.1 \r\n Foo: bar \r\n baz: ") ``` If the server accepts this and processes the injected header "Foo: bar", it indicates vulnerability to CRLF injection. Monitoring logs for unexpected or malformed HTTP headers or responses containing injected headers can also help detect exploitation attempts. [2]


What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?

The immediate mitigation steps are to upgrade the affected packages to the fixed versions: HTTP.jl to version 1.10.17 or later, and URIs.jl to version 1.6.0 or later. These versions include validation that rejects URIs containing CR or LF characters, preventing CRLF injection. As a temporary workaround before upgrading, manually validate and sanitize any URIs to ensure they do not contain CR or LF characters before passing them to these packages. [1, 2]


Ask Our AI Assistant
Need more information? Ask your question to get an AI reply (Powered by our expertise)
0/70
EPSS Chart