CVE-2025-55159
Unknown Unknown - Not Provided
BaseFortify

Publication date: 2025-08-11

Last updated on: 2025-08-12

Assigner: GitHub, Inc.

Description
slab is a pre-allocated storage for a uniform data type. In version 0.4.10, the get_disjoint_mut method incorrectly checked if indices were within the slab's capacity instead of its length, allowing access to uninitialized memory. This could lead to undefined behavior or potential crashes. This has been fixed in slab 0.4.11. A workaround for this issue involves to avoid using get_disjoint_mut with indices that might be beyond the slab's actual length.
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
Probability:
Percentile:
Meta Information
Published
2025-08-11
Last Modified
2025-08-12
Generated
2026-05-27
AI Q&A
2025-08-12
EPSS Evaluated
2026-05-25
NVD
Affected Vendors & Products
Showing 2 associated CPEs
Vendor Product Version / Range
tokio-rs slab 0.4.11
tokio-rs slab 0.4.10
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-119 The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?

In slab version 0.4.10, the get_disjoint_mut method incorrectly checked if indices were within the slab's capacity instead of its actual length. This flaw allows access to uninitialized memory, which can cause undefined behavior or crashes. The issue was fixed in version 0.4.11.


How can this vulnerability impact me? :

This vulnerability can lead to undefined behavior or potential crashes in applications using slab 0.4.10, due to access to uninitialized memory. This may affect the stability and reliability of the software.


What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?

To mitigate this vulnerability, avoid using the get_disjoint_mut method with indices that might be beyond the slab's actual length. Additionally, update slab to version 0.4.11 or later where this issue has been fixed.


Ask Our AI Assistant
Need more information? Ask your question to get an AI reply (Powered by our expertise)
0/70
EPSS Chart