CVE-2023-53645
Unknown Unknown - Not Provided
BaseFortify

Publication date: 2025-10-07

Last updated on: 2026-02-03

Assigner: kernel.org

Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Make bpf_refcount_acquire fallible for non-owning refs This patch fixes an incorrect assumption made in the original bpf_refcount series [0], specifically that the BPF program calling bpf_refcount_acquire on some node can always guarantee that the node is alive. In that series, the patch adding failure behavior to rbtree_add and list_push_{front, back} breaks this assumption for non-owning references. Consider the following program: n = bpf_kptr_xchg(&mapval, NULL); /* skip error checking */ bpf_spin_lock(&l); if(bpf_rbtree_add(&t, &n->rb, less)) { bpf_refcount_acquire(n); /* Failed to add, do something else with the node */ } bpf_spin_unlock(&l); It's incorrect to assume that bpf_refcount_acquire will always succeed in this scenario. bpf_refcount_acquire is being called in a critical section here, but the lock being held is associated with rbtree t, which isn't necessarily the lock associated with the tree that the node is already in. So after bpf_rbtree_add fails to add the node and calls bpf_obj_drop in it, the program has no ownership of the node's lifetime. Therefore the node's refcount can be decr'd to 0 at any time after the failing rbtree_add. If this happens before the refcount_acquire above, the node might be free'd, and regardless refcount_acquire will be incrementing a 0 refcount. Later patches in the series exercise this scenario, resulting in the expected complaint from the kernel (without this patch's changes): refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 207 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xbc/0x110 Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(O) CPU: 1 PID: 207 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G O 6.3.0-rc7-02231-g723de1a718a2-dirty #371 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xbc/0x110 Code: 6f 64 f6 02 01 e8 84 a3 5c ff 0f 0b eb 9d 80 3d 5e 64 f6 02 00 75 94 48 c7 c7 e0 13 d2 82 c6 05 4e 64 f6 02 01 e8 64 a3 5c ff <0f> 0b e9 7a ff ff ff 80 3d 38 64 f6 02 00 0f 85 6d ff ff ff 48 c7 RSP: 0018:ffff88810b9179b0 EFLAGS: 00010082 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000202 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffffffff857c3680 RBP: ffff88810027d3c0 R08: ffffffff8125f2a4 R09: ffff88810b9176e7 R10: ffffed1021722edc R11: 746e756f63666572 R12: ffff88810027d388 R13: ffff88810027d3c0 R14: ffffc900005fe030 R15: ffffc900005fe048 FS: 00007fee0584a700(0000) GS:ffff88811b280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005634a96f6c58 CR3: 0000000108ce9002 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> bpf_refcount_acquire_impl+0xb5/0xc0 (rest of output snipped) The patch addresses this by changing bpf_refcount_acquire_impl to use refcount_inc_not_zero instead of refcount_inc and marking bpf_refcount_acquire KF_RET_NULL. For owning references, though, we know the above scenario is not possible and thus that bpf_refcount_acquire will always succeed. Some verifier bookkeeping is added to track "is input owning ref?" for bpf_refcount_acquire calls and return false from is_kfunc_ret_null for bpf_refcount_acquire on owning refs despite it being marked KF_RET_NULL. Existing selftests using bpf_refcount_acquire are modified where necessary to NULL-check its return value. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
Probability:
Percentile:
Meta Information
Published
2025-10-07
Last Modified
2026-02-03
Generated
2026-05-07
AI Q&A
2025-10-07
EPSS Evaluated
2026-05-05
NVD
CVE-2023-53645
Affected Vendors & Products
Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
linux linux_kernel From 5.15.160 (inc) to 5.16 (inc)
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-416 The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?

This vulnerability involves the Linux kernel's BPF subsystem where the function bpf_refcount_acquire incorrectly assumed that it would always succeed in acquiring a reference count on a node. However, due to changes in related functions (like rbtree_add), this assumption is invalid for non-owning references. If bpf_refcount_acquire is called after a failed addition to a red-black tree, the node's reference count might have dropped to zero and the node could be freed, leading to a use-after-free condition when bpf_refcount_acquire tries to increment the reference count. The patch fixes this by making bpf_refcount_acquire fallible (able to fail) for non-owning references, preventing unsafe increments on zero refcounts.


How can this vulnerability impact me? :

This vulnerability can lead to a use-after-free condition in the Linux kernel's BPF subsystem, which may cause kernel crashes or undefined behavior. Such issues can compromise system stability and security, potentially allowing attackers to exploit the kernel for privilege escalation or denial of service.


How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?

This vulnerability manifests as a kernel warning related to refcount operations, specifically messages like 'refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.' Detection involves monitoring kernel logs for such warnings. You can check the kernel log using commands like 'dmesg | grep refcount' or 'journalctl -k | grep refcount' to identify if this issue occurs on your system.


What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?

The vulnerability is fixed by a kernel patch that changes the behavior of bpf_refcount_acquire to safely handle non-owning references. Immediate mitigation involves updating your Linux kernel to a version that includes this patch. Until then, avoid running untrusted or vulnerable BPF programs that might trigger this issue.


Ask Our AI Assistant
Need more information? Ask your question to get an AI reply (Powered by our expertise)
0/70
EPSS Chart