CVE-2023-53795
BaseFortify
Publication date: 2025-12-09
Last updated on: 2025-12-09
Assigner: kernel.org
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-UNKNOWN |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
This vulnerability is a race condition in the Linux kernel's IOMMUFD_DESTROY operation where the reference count (refcount) is incorrectly incremented without proper synchronization. This violates the assumption that all temporary refcount elevations are protected by a lock (destroy_rwsem), leading to spurious failures and warnings in the kernel. The issue arises because IOMMUFD_DESTROY increments the refcount while racing with iommufd_object_destroy_user(), causing potential race conditions and instability.
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
This vulnerability can cause spurious failures and warnings in the Linux kernel, potentially leading to instability or crashes when the race condition occurs. It may affect system reliability, especially in environments using the IOMMUFD interface, by causing unexpected errors during object destruction operations.
How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?
This vulnerability manifests as race conditions in the Linux kernel's iommufd subsystem, potentially causing warnings or errors in kernel logs such as 'WARNING: CPU: ... iommufd_access_destroy'. To detect it, you can monitor your system's kernel logs for such warnings using commands like 'dmesg | grep iommufd' or 'journalctl -k | grep iommufd'. Additionally, running kernel self-tests related to iommufd (if available) might help identify the issue.
What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?
Immediate mitigation involves updating the Linux kernel to a version where this vulnerability is fixed, as the issue is resolved by changes in the kernel code to avoid incrementing the refcount on the IOMMUFD_DESTROY path and using proper locking mechanisms. Until then, avoid racing IOMMUFD_DESTROY with other operations, as such races can cause spurious failures. Monitoring and limiting access to the iommufd interface may reduce exposure.