CVE-2023-53878
HTTP Request Smuggling in Member Login Script 3.3 Enables Bypass
Publication date: 2025-12-15
Last updated on: 2025-12-15
Assigner: VulnCheck
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| phpjabbers | member_login_script | 3.3 |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-444 | The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination. |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
This vulnerability in Member Login Script 3.3 is a client-side desynchronization attack caused by improper handling of HTTP POST requests. The server fails to correctly parse the Content-Length header and does not close the connection after processing a request. Attackers can exploit this by sending specially crafted POST requests that contain a second, smuggled HTTP request within the body of the first. The server then interprets this embedded request as a separate subsequent request, enabling HTTP request smuggling. This can allow attackers to bypass server-side request processing controls and potentially inject malicious requests. [1, 3]
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
The vulnerability can allow attackers to bypass security controls on the server by smuggling additional HTTP requests within legitimate ones. This can lead to unauthorized actions, injection of malicious requests, and potentially compromise the security of the web application. Since the Member Login Script manages user authentication and access control, exploitation could undermine these protections, leading to unauthorized access or manipulation of protected content and user data. [1, 2, 3]
How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?
This vulnerability can be detected by monitoring for unusual or crafted HTTP POST requests that include smuggled secondary requests within the body, especially targeting the path '/1692959852_473/index.php'. One can use network traffic analysis tools like Wireshark or tcpdump to capture HTTP traffic and inspect POST requests for irregular Content-Length headers or embedded HTTP requests. Additionally, using curl or similar tools to send crafted POST requests to test the server's handling of Content-Length and connection closure can help detect the vulnerability. For example, sending a POST request with a Content-Length header that does not match the actual body length and observing if the server processes embedded requests can indicate the vulnerability. Specific commands might include: 1) tcpdump -i <interface> -A 'tcp port 80 or 443' to capture HTTP traffic; 2) curl -v -X POST 'http://target/1692959852_473/index.php?controller=pjFront&action=pjActionLoadCss' -H 'Content-Length: 1190' --data-binary @crafted_payload.txt to test with a crafted payload. However, no exact detection commands are provided in the resources. [1]
What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?
Immediate mitigation steps include restricting or filtering HTTP POST requests to the vulnerable endpoint '/1692959852_473/index.php' to prevent crafted requests with manipulated Content-Length headers. Applying patches or updates from the vendor (phpjabbers.com) once available is critical. In the meantime, implementing web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block HTTP request smuggling patterns, such as inconsistent Content-Length headers or multiple HTTP requests in a single POST body, can help mitigate exploitation. Additionally, monitoring logs for suspicious request patterns and limiting access to the affected script to trusted users or IP addresses can reduce risk. Since the vulnerability arises from improper HTTP request parsing, ensuring the web server and any reverse proxies are configured to correctly handle Content-Length and connection closure headers is also recommended. [1, 3]