CVE-2025-15154
Improper Input Validation in PbootCMS Header Handler Enables Remote Attack
Publication date: 2025-12-28
Last updated on: 2025-12-28
Assigner: VulDB
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| pbootcms | pbootcms | 3.2.12 |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-348 | The product has two different sources of the same data or information, but it uses the source that has less support for verification, is less trusted, or is less resistant to attack. |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
This vulnerability exists in PbootCMS up to version 3.2.12, specifically in the get_user_ip function of the core/function/handle.php file within the Header Handler component. It involves manipulation of the X-Forwarded-For argument, which causes the system to use a less trusted source for the user's IP address. This can be exploited remotely.
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
The vulnerability can lead to the system relying on a less trusted source for the user's IP address, potentially allowing an attacker to spoof their IP. This may impact the integrity of user identification and tracking, possibly enabling unauthorized actions or evasion of security controls that depend on accurate IP information.
How does this vulnerability affect compliance with common standards and regulations (like GDPR, HIPAA)?:
This vulnerability allows attackers to spoof IP addresses, bypass security controls such as login lockouts and IP-based access restrictions, and potentially gain unauthorized access or cause data exposure. Such unauthorized access and data integrity issues could lead to non-compliance with standards and regulations like GDPR and HIPAA, which require protection of personal data and secure access controls. Additionally, the pollution of audit logs with attacker-controlled IPs may hinder accurate security monitoring and incident response, further impacting compliance. [2]
How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?
This vulnerability can be detected by monitoring HTTP requests for suspicious or unusual X-Forwarded-For header values that do not match expected trusted proxy IPs. One can use network traffic inspection tools or web server logs to identify requests with spoofed or varying X-Forwarded-For headers. For example, using command-line tools like tcpdump or tshark to capture HTTP traffic and grep for X-Forwarded-For headers can help detect exploitation attempts. Additionally, searching web server logs for repeated failed login attempts with different X-Forwarded-For values can indicate brute force attacks exploiting this vulnerability. A sample command to check logs for X-Forwarded-For usage could be: `grep -i 'X-Forwarded-For' /var/log/apache2/access.log` or `grep 'X-Forwarded-For' /var/log/nginx/access.log`. To capture live traffic: `tcpdump -A -s 0 'tcp port 80 and (((ip[2:2] - ((ip[0]&0xf)<<2)) - ((tcp[12]&0xf0)>>2)) != 0)' | grep -i 'X-Forwarded-For'`. [2, 3]
What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?
Immediate mitigation steps include modifying the get_user_ip() function to only trust the X-Forwarded-For header if the request originates from a trusted proxy IP range. Implement a helper function to verify trusted proxies and add configuration options to enable or disable proxy trust and specify trusted proxy IPs. For critical security functions such as login lockout, use the REMOTE_ADDR server variable directly instead of the spoofable get_user_ip() function. Additionally, ensure that any proxies or CDNs in front of the application properly sanitize or overwrite the X-Forwarded-For header to prevent spoofing. If possible, replace or update the affected component or product to a version that addresses this issue. [2, 1]