CVE-2025-66045
BaseFortify
Publication date: 2025-12-11
Last updated on: 2025-12-17
Assigner: Talos
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| libbiosig_project | libbiosig | to 3.9.2 (exc) |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-121 | A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function). |
| CWE-787 | The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?
Detection involves identifying the presence of libbiosig version 3.9.1 and monitoring or scanning for malicious MFER files with malformed Tag 3 TLV frames that have length fields exceeding the expected buffer size. Since the vulnerability is triggered by specially crafted MFER files, you can detect attempts by scanning for such files or monitoring file inputs to applications using libbiosig. Specific commands are not provided in the resources, but you might use file scanning tools or custom scripts to parse MFER files and check for Tag 3 entries with length fields greater than 17 bytes. [1]
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
This vulnerability involves several stack-based buffer overflow issues in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig version 3.9.1. When processing a specially crafted MFER file with Tag 65, these vulnerabilities can be triggered, potentially allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by providing a malicious MFER file, which can lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected system. This can result in full compromise of the system, including unauthorized access, data corruption, or denial of service.
What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?
Immediate mitigation steps include preventing the processing of untrusted or unauthenticated MFER files, especially those with Tag 3 TLV frames containing length fields larger than the buffer size. Applying patches or updates to libbiosig that fix the buffer overflow is recommended once available. Until then, restrict or disable the use of libbiosig 3.9.1 in environments where untrusted MFER files might be processed. [1]
How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?
Detection involves identifying the presence of libbiosig version 3.9.1 and monitoring or scanning for malicious MFER files with malformed Tag 3 TLV frames that have length fields exceeding the expected buffer size. Since the vulnerability is triggered by specially crafted MFER files, you can detect attempts by scanning for MFER files with Tag 3 length fields greater than 17 bytes. A practical approach is to use file inspection tools or custom scripts to parse MFER files and check the length fields of Tag 3 entries. For example, you could use a hex editor or a scripting language like Python to parse MFER files and flag those with suspicious length values. Additionally, monitoring application logs or using AddressSanitizer during testing can help detect exploitation attempts. Specific commands depend on your environment, but a sample command might be a Python script that reads MFER files and checks Tag 3 lengths. No direct command-line tool is provided in the resources. [1]
What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?
Immediate mitigation steps include avoiding the use of libbiosig version 3.9.1 for processing untrusted MFER files until a patched version is available. Do not open or process MFER files from untrusted or unknown sources. If possible, apply any available patches or updates from the libbiosig project that address this buffer overflow. Additionally, implement input validation to reject MFER files with Tag 3 length fields exceeding the safe buffer size (17 bytes). Employ runtime protections such as AddressSanitizer or other memory safety tools during development and testing to detect exploitation attempts. Restrict file access permissions and monitor for suspicious activity related to MFER file processing. [1]