CVE-2026-23105
Unknown Unknown - Not Provided
Inconsistent Class Activation Check in Linux Kernel QFQ Scheduler

Publication date: 2026-02-04

Last updated on: 2026-04-03

Assigner: kernel.org

Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: qfq: Use cl_is_active to determine whether class is active in qfq_rm_from_ag This is more of a preventive patch to make the code more consistent and to prevent possible exploits that employ child qlen manipulations on qfq. use cl_is_active instead of relying on the child qdisc's qlen to determine class activation.
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
Probability:
Percentile:
Meta Information
Published
2026-02-04
Last Modified
2026-04-03
Generated
2026-05-07
AI Q&A
2026-02-04
EPSS Evaluated
2026-05-05
NVD
Affected Vendors & Products
Showing 12 associated CPEs
Vendor Product Version / Range
linux linux_kernel 6.19
linux linux_kernel 6.19
linux linux_kernel 6.19
linux linux_kernel 6.19
linux linux_kernel 6.19
linux linux_kernel From 3.8 (inc) to 5.10.249 (exc)
linux linux_kernel From 5.11 (inc) to 5.15.199 (exc)
linux linux_kernel From 5.16 (inc) to 6.1.162 (exc)
linux linux_kernel From 6.2 (inc) to 6.6.122 (exc)
linux linux_kernel From 6.7 (inc) to 6.12.68 (exc)
linux linux_kernel From 6.13 (inc) to 6.18.8 (exc)
linux linux_kernel 6.19
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-UNKNOWN
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?

This vulnerability relates to the Linux kernel's network scheduler component, specifically the qfq (Quick Fair Queueing) module. The issue was that the code used the child queue length (qlen) to determine whether a class was active, which could be manipulated. The patch changes this behavior to use the cl_is_active function instead, making the determination of class activity more consistent and preventing potential exploits that manipulate child qlen.


How can this vulnerability impact me? :

If exploited, this vulnerability could allow attackers to manipulate the network scheduler's behavior by altering the child queue length, potentially leading to inconsistent or unintended network traffic handling. This could affect network performance or fairness in traffic scheduling.


How does this vulnerability affect compliance with common standards and regulations (like GDPR, HIPAA)?:

I don't know


How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?

I don't know


What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?

I don't know


Ask Our AI Assistant
Need more information? Ask your question to get an AI reply (Powered by our expertise)
0/70
EPSS Chart