CVE-2018-25223
Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in Crashmail 1.6 Enables Remote Code Execution
Publication date: 2026-03-28
Last updated on: 2026-04-02
Assigner: VulnCheck
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| ftnapps | crashmail_ii | to 1.6 (inc) |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-787 | The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
CVE-2018-25223 is a critical stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability found in Crashmail version 1.6 and earlier. It occurs because the application does not properly check the boundaries of user-supplied input, allowing attackers to overwrite parts of the stack.
Remote attackers can exploit this flaw by sending specially crafted malicious input containing Return-Oriented Programming (ROP) chains. These chains enable the attacker to execute arbitrary code within the context of the application.
If exploitation fails, it may cause the application to crash, resulting in a denial of service.
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
This vulnerability can have severe impacts including remote code execution, which allows attackers to run arbitrary commands or code on the affected system without any privileges or user interaction.
Successful exploitation compromises the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system, potentially allowing attackers to take full control of the application environment.
Even unsuccessful attempts can cause denial of service by crashing the application.
How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?
The vulnerability in Crashmail 1.6 is a stack-based buffer overflow exploitable by sending specially crafted input to the application. Detection involves monitoring for unusual or malformed input sent to the Crashmail service or application.
Since the exploit involves sending a payload as an argument to the Crashmail binary, one detection method is to check running processes or command-line arguments for suspicious patterns such as long strings of repeated characters (e.g., 216 'A's) or ROP chain indicators.
On a Linux system, you can use commands like:
- ps aux | grep crashmail # To check running Crashmail processes and their arguments
- netstat -anp | grep crashmail # To check network connections related to Crashmail
- tcpdump -i <interface> port <crashmail_port> -w crashmail_traffic.pcap # To capture network traffic for analysis
Additionally, monitoring system logs for crashes or denial-of-service symptoms related to Crashmail may help detect failed exploit attempts.
How does this vulnerability affect compliance with common standards and regulations (like GDPR, HIPAA)?:
The vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, impacting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system with high severity.
Such a critical security flaw could lead to unauthorized access or data breaches, which may result in non-compliance with standards and regulations like GDPR and HIPAA that require protection of sensitive data and system integrity.
However, the provided information does not explicitly detail the direct impact on compliance with these regulations.
What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?
Immediate mitigation steps include:
- Disabling or stopping the Crashmail 1.6 service or application until a patch or update is available.
- Restricting network access to the Crashmail service to trusted hosts only, using firewall rules or network segmentation.
- Monitoring for and blocking suspicious input patterns that resemble exploit payloads, such as unusually long input strings or known ROP chain signatures.
- Applying any available patches or updates from the vendor to fix the buffer overflow vulnerability.
Since the vulnerability allows remote code execution without authentication or user interaction, prioritizing these mitigations is critical to prevent exploitation.