CVE-2025-15598
Improper JWT Signature Verification in Dataease SQLBot
Publication date: 2026-03-03
Last updated on: 2026-04-29
Assigner: VulDB
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| fit2cloud | sqlbot | to 1.5.1 (inc) |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-347 | The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. |
| CWE-345 | The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data. |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
[{'type': 'paragraph', 'content': "CVE-2025-15598 is a vulnerability in Dataease SQLBot versions up to 1.5.1, specifically in the validateEmbedded function of the JWT Token Handler component. The vulnerability arises because the function disables verification of the JWT token's cryptographic signature and expiration, allowing attackers to forge arbitrary JWT tokens if they know a valid assistant or embedded ID."}, {'type': 'paragraph', 'content': 'This flaw enables attackers to impersonate any user by bypassing the JWT token authentication process, compromising the integrity of the system. The attack can be initiated remotely, though it is considered difficult to exploit.'}] [1, 3]
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
This vulnerability impacts the integrity of the system by allowing remote attackers to bypass JWT token authentication and impersonate any user without needing authentication themselves.
While it does not directly affect confidentiality or availability, the ability to forge tokens and impersonate users can lead to unauthorized actions within the system.
The exploit is publicly available, which increases the risk of exploitation despite the attack complexity being high.
How does this vulnerability affect compliance with common standards and regulations (like GDPR, HIPAA)?:
I don't know
How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?
[{'type': 'paragraph', 'content': 'This vulnerability involves improper verification of JWT token signatures in Dataease SQLBot up to version 1.5.1, specifically in the validateEmbedded function. Detection can focus on identifying usage of vulnerable SQLBot versions and monitoring for forged JWT tokens that bypass signature verification.'}, {'type': 'paragraph', 'content': 'Since the vulnerability allows attackers to forge JWT tokens by disabling signature and expiration verification, detection commands could include searching for the presence of the vulnerable SQLBot version and inspecting JWT tokens for anomalies.'}, {'type': 'list_item', 'content': 'Check installed SQLBot version to confirm if it is up to 1.5.1 (vulnerable):\n - Example command: `sqlbot --version` or check package manager info.'}, {'type': 'list_item', 'content': "Search for the vulnerable function usage or configuration in the source code or deployed files:\n - Example command: `grep -r 'verify_signature: False' /path/to/sqlbot/`"}, {'type': 'list_item', 'content': 'Monitor network traffic for suspicious JWT tokens that do not have valid cryptographic signatures or have unusual embedded IDs.'}, {'type': 'list_item', 'content': 'Use JWT decoding tools to inspect tokens for missing or disabled signature verification.'}] [1, 3]
What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?
There are no known direct countermeasures or mitigations identified for this vulnerability in the affected versions of SQLBot.
Immediate mitigation steps include replacing the affected component with an alternative product or upgrading to a version that addresses the vulnerability if available.
Additionally, restricting access to the vulnerable service and monitoring for suspicious JWT token activity can help reduce risk.
Since the vulnerability is difficult to exploit but has a public proof-of-concept, applying network-level protections and limiting exposure of the vulnerable service is recommended.