CVE-2026-30910
Received Received - Intake
Integer Overflow in Crypt::Sodium::XS Causes Buffer Overflow Risk

Publication date: 2026-03-08

Last updated on: 2026-03-10

Assigner: CPANSec

Description
Crypt::Sodium::XS versions through 0.001000 for Perl has potential integer overflows. Combined aead encryption, combined signature creation, and bin2hex functions do not check that output size will be less than SIZE_MAX, which could lead to integer wraparound causing an undersized output buffer. This can cause a crash in bin2hex and encryption algorithms other than aes256gcm. For aes256gcm encryption and signatures, an undersized buffer could lead to buffer overflow. Encountering this issue is unlikely as the message length would need to be very large. For bin2hex the input size would have to be > SIZE_MAX / 2 For aegis encryption the input size would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 32U For other encryption the input size would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 16U For signatures the input size would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 64U
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
Probability:
Percentile:
Meta Information
Published
2026-03-08
Last Modified
2026-03-10
Generated
2026-06-16
AI Q&A
2026-03-08
EPSS Evaluated
2026-06-15
NVD
EUVD
Affected Vendors & Products
Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
iamb crypt to 0.001001 (inc)
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-190 The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Quick Actions
Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This vulnerability exists in Crypt::Sodium::XS versions through 0.001000 for Perl and involves potential integer overflows.

Specifically, the combined AEAD encryption, combined signature creation, and bin2hex functions do not verify that the output size will be less than SIZE_MAX. This lack of checking can cause an integer wraparound, resulting in an undersized output buffer.

The undersized buffer can cause a crash in bin2hex and encryption algorithms other than aes256gcm. For aes256gcm encryption and signatures, it could lead to a buffer overflow.

However, triggering this issue is unlikely because it requires very large message lengths, such as input sizes greater than SIZE_MAX divided by 2 for bin2hex, or close to SIZE_MAX minus a small constant for encryption and signature functions.

Impact Analysis

This vulnerability can impact you by causing crashes or buffer overflows when processing very large inputs with Crypt::Sodium::XS.

A crash could lead to denial of service, disrupting the availability of applications using these functions.

In the case of aes256gcm encryption and signatures, a buffer overflow could potentially lead to memory corruption, which might be exploited for arbitrary code execution or other security breaches.

However, the likelihood of encountering this vulnerability is low because it requires extremely large input sizes.

Compliance Impact

I don't know

Detection Guidance

I don't know

Mitigation Strategies

I don't know

Chat Assistant
Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-30910. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70
EPSS Chart