CVE-2026-31455
Analyzed
Analyzed - Analysis Complete
Race Condition in Linux XFS Unmount Causes Potential Data Corruption
Publication date: 2026-04-22
Last updated on: 2026-06-05
Assigner: kernel.org
Description
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: stop reclaim before pushing AIL during unmount
The unmount sequence in xfs_unmount_flush_inodes() pushed the AIL while
background reclaim and inodegc are still running. This is broken
independently of any use-after-free issues - background reclaim and
inodegc should not be running while the AIL is being pushed during
unmount, as inodegc can dirty and insert inodes into the AIL during the
flush, and background reclaim can race to abort and free dirty inodes.
Reorder xfs_unmount_flush_inodes() to stop inodegc and cancel background
reclaim before pushing the AIL. Stop inodegc before cancelling
m_reclaim_work because the inodegc worker can re-queue m_reclaim_work
via xfs_inodegc_set_reclaimable.
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
| linux | linux_kernel | From 5.11 (inc) to 5.15.203 (exc) |
| linux | linux_kernel | From 5.16 (inc) to 6.1.168 (exc) |
| linux | linux_kernel | From 6.13 (inc) to 6.18.21 (exc) |
| linux | linux_kernel | From 6.19 (inc) to 6.19.11 (exc) |
| linux | linux_kernel | From 6.2 (inc) to 6.6.131 (exc) |
| linux | linux_kernel | From 6.7 (inc) to 6.12.80 (exc) |
| linux | linux_kernel | From 5.9 (inc) to 5.10.253 (exc) |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-416 | The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer. |