CVE-2026-31581
Awaiting Analysis Awaiting Analysis - Queue

BaseFortify

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-31581, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-04-24

Last updated on: 2026-06-01

Assigner: kernel.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: 6fire: fix use-after-free on disconnect In usb6fire_chip_abort(), the chip struct is allocated as the card's private data (via snd_card_new with sizeof(struct sfire_chip)). When snd_card_free_when_closed() is called and no file handles are open, the card and embedded chip are freed synchronously. The subsequent chip->card = NULL write then hits freed slab memory. Call trace: usb6fire_chip_abort sound/usb/6fire/chip.c:59 [inline] usb6fire_chip_disconnect+0x348/0x358 sound/usb/6fire/chip.c:182 usb_unbind_interface+0x1a8/0x88c drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458 ... hub_event+0x1a04/0x4518 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5953 Fix by moving the card lifecycle out of usb6fire_chip_abort() and into usb6fire_chip_disconnect(). The card pointer is saved in a local before any teardown, snd_card_disconnect() is called first to prevent new opens, URBs are aborted while chip is still valid, and snd_card_free_when_closed() is called last so chip is never accessed after the card may be freed.

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-04-24
Last Modified
2026-06-01
Generated
2026-07-06
EPSS Evaluated
2026-07-05
NVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 5 associated CPEs
Vendor Product Version / Range
linux linux_kernel From 6.13 (inc) to 6.18.24 (exc)
linux linux_kernel From 6.19 (inc) to 6.19.14 (exc)
linux linux_kernel From 7.0 (inc) to 7.0.1 (exc)
linux linux_kernel to 6.6.136 (exc)
linux linux_kernel From 6.12 (inc) to 6.12.83 (exc)

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-416 The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
AI Quick Actions have not been generated yet.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-31581. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart