CVE-2026-34068
BLS Rogue-Key Vulnerability in Nimiq Staking Contract
Publication date: 2026-04-22
Last updated on: 2026-04-24
Assigner: GitHub, Inc.
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| nimiq | nimiq_proof-of-stake | to 1.3.0 (exc) |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-347 | The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?
The vulnerability is fixed in version 1.3.0 of nimiq-transaction. Immediate mitigation involves upgrading to version 1.3.0 or later.
No known workarounds are available.
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
This vulnerability exists in the nimiq-transaction component used in Nimiq's Rust implementation. Before version 1.3.0, the staking contract allowed UpdateValidator transactions to set a new voting key without providing the required proof-of-knowledge. This omission bypasses the protection against BLS rogue-key attacks, which occur when public keys are aggregated improperly.
Because the Tendermint macro block justification verification aggregates validator voting keys and verifies a single aggregated BLS signature, a rogue voting key can let an attacker forge a quorum-looking justification with only one signature.
Although the impact is critical, the exploitability is low since voting keys are fixed per epoch and the attacker would need to know the next epoch validator set, which is unlikely.
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
This vulnerability can allow an attacker to forge a quorum-looking justification in the blockchain consensus process by exploiting a rogue voting key.
Such an attack could undermine the integrity of the consensus mechanism by making it appear that a sufficient number of validators have signed off on a block when in fact only a single signature was produced.
This could lead to critical impacts on the trustworthiness and security of the blockchain network.