CVE-2026-7305
Received Received - Intake
Server-Side Request Forgery in xxl-job triggerJob Endpoint

Publication date: 2026-04-28

Last updated on: 2026-04-29

Assigner: VulDB

Description
A weakness has been identified in Xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.3.2. The affected element is the function triggerJob of the file xxl-job-admin/src/main/java/com/xxl/job/admin/service/impl/XxlJobServiceImpl.java of the component trigger Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument addressList causes server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. There is ongoing doubt regarding the real existence of this vulnerability. The project maintainer explains (translated from Chinese): "Triggers are manually activated and involve login and access control, thus requiring management." The pull request by the researcher got rejected because of that.
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
Probability:
Percentile:
Meta Information
Published
2026-04-28
Last Modified
2026-04-29
Generated
2026-05-07
AI Q&A
2026-04-29
EPSS Evaluated
2026-05-05
NVD
CVE-2026-7305
Affected Vendors & Products
Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
xuxueli xxl-job to 3.3.2 (inc)
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-918 The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?

This vulnerability exists in Xuxueli xxl-job up to version 3.3.2, specifically in the triggerJob function of the trigger Endpoint. It involves manipulation of the argument addressList, which can lead to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This means an attacker can remotely cause the server to make unintended requests to other systems.

However, there is some doubt about the actual existence of this vulnerability because triggering the function requires manual activation, login, and access control, which limits the attack surface.


How can this vulnerability impact me? :

If exploited, this vulnerability could allow an attacker to perform server-side request forgery, potentially enabling them to make unauthorized requests from the server to internal or external systems. This could lead to information disclosure, unauthorized actions, or further attacks within the network.

However, since the trigger requires manual activation with login and access control, the risk may be limited to authorized users or administrators.


Ask Our AI Assistant
Need more information? Ask your question to get an AI reply (Powered by our expertise)
0/70
EPSS Chart