CVE-2026-45837
Analyzed
Analyzed - Analysis Complete
Use-After-Free in Linux Kernel BPF Arena
Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-45837, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.
Publication date: 2026-05-27
Last updated on: 2026-06-26
Assigner: kernel.org
Description
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix use-after-free in arena_vm_close on fork
arena_vm_open() only bumps vml->mmap_count but never registers the
child VMA in arena->vma_list. The vml->vma always points at the
parent VMA, so after parent munmap the pointer dangles. If the child
then calls bpf_arena_free_pages(), zap_pages() reads the stale
vml->vma triggering use-after-free.
Fix this by preventing the arena VMA from being inherited across
fork with VM_DONTCOPY, and preventing VMA splits via the may_split
callback.
Also reject mremap with a .mremap callback returning -EINVAL. A
same-size mremap(MREMAP_FIXED) on the full arena VMA reaches
copy_vma() through the following path:
check_prep_vma() - returns 0 early: new_len == old_len
skips VM_DONTEXPAND check
prep_move_vma() - vm_start == old_addr and
vm_end == old_addr + old_len
so may_split is never called
move_vma()
copy_vma_and_data()
copy_vma()
vm_area_dup() - copies vm_private_data (vml pointer)
vm_ops->open() - bumps vml->mmap_count
vm_ops->mremap() - returns -EINVAL, rollback unmaps new VMA
The refcount ensures the rollback's arena_vm_close does not free
the vml shared with the original VMA.
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | From 6.13 (inc) to 6.18.30 (exc) |
| linux | linux_kernel | From 6.19 (inc) to 7.0.7 (exc) |
| linux | linux_kernel | From 6.9 (inc) to 6.12.88 (exc) |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-416 | The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer. |