CVE-2026-6394
Server-Side Request Forgery in Nexa Blocks WordPress Plugin
Publication date: 2026-05-20
Last updated on: 2026-05-20
Assigner: Wordfence
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| nexa_blocks | nexa_blocks | to 1.1.1 (inc) |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-918 | The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
The Nexa Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in versions up to and including 1.1.1. This happens because the import_demo() function accepts a user-supplied URL through the demo_json_file POST parameter and uses it directly in a server-side HTTP request without validating or restricting the URL. Additionally, a security nonce intended to protect this action is publicly exposed on the frontend, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exploit this vulnerability.
As a result, attackers can make the server send HTTP requests to arbitrary internal or external destinations, including internal services, cloud metadata endpoints like AWS instance metadata, localhost services, and other resources that should not be publicly accessible. There is also a secondary SSRF vector where image URLs from the attacker-controlled JSON response are fetched by the server, enabling chained exploitation.
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
This vulnerability can allow unauthenticated attackers to make the server perform HTTP requests to internal or external systems that are normally inaccessible. This can lead to exposure of sensitive internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and other protected resources.
Such unauthorized access can result in information disclosure, potential further exploitation of internal systems, and compromise of the server's security posture.