CVE-2026-8258
Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in Squirrel up to 3.2
Publication date: 2026-05-11
Last updated on: 2026-05-11
Assigner: VulDB
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-119 | The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data. |
| CWE-121 | A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function). |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
CVE-2026-8258 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability found in the Squirrel scripting language, specifically in the function validate_format within the sqstdlib/sqstdstring.cpp file.
The issue is caused by an off-by-one error in the length check of a format specifier. The code uses a condition that allows a format specifier of exactly 20 characters to bypass the length check, leading to a memcpy operation that writes 21 bytes into a 20-byte stack buffer.
This overflow corrupts adjacent stack variables or the saved frame pointer, which can cause denial-of-service or other unintended behaviors. The vulnerability can only be exploited locally and affects applications running untrusted Squirrel scripts with access to the string library.
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
This vulnerability can lead to a stack-based buffer overflow that corrupts adjacent stack variables or the saved frame pointer.
The impact includes potential denial-of-service (DoS) conditions or other unintended behaviors caused by memory corruption.
Since the exploit requires local access and execution of untrusted Squirrel scripts, the risk depends on the environment where Squirrel scripts are run and the level of local user access.
How can this vulnerability be detected on my network or system? Can you suggest some commands?
This vulnerability is a stack-based buffer overflow in the Squirrel scripting language's validate_format function and can only be exploited locally. Detection would involve identifying if the vulnerable version of Squirrel (up to 3.2) is in use and if untrusted scripts are executed that call the vulnerable function.
Since the exploit requires local execution and involves specific Squirrel scripts, detection commands would focus on verifying the Squirrel version and scanning for usage of the vulnerable function in scripts.
- Check the installed Squirrel version: `squirrel -v` or check the package manager for the installed version.
- Search for Squirrel scripts that use the validate_format function or related string library calls.
- Monitor local execution logs or audit logs for suspicious or unexpected execution of Squirrel scripts.
No specific detection commands or signatures are provided in the available resources.
What immediate steps should I take to mitigate this vulnerability?
Immediate mitigation steps include preventing local untrusted users from executing vulnerable Squirrel scripts and restricting access to the affected Squirrel environment.
Since the vulnerability is due to an off-by-one error in the validate_format function, the recommended fix is to update the condition in the source code to properly check the format specifier length.
- Apply the patch that changes the condition to `if (n - start >= MAX_FORMAT_LEN)` in sqstdlib/sqstdstring.cpp to prevent the overflow.
- If an official patch or updated version is not yet available, consider disabling or restricting the use of the vulnerable function or the entire string library in Squirrel scripts.
- Limit local user privileges to prevent exploitation since the attack requires local access.
How does this vulnerability affect compliance with common standards and regulations (like GDPR, HIPAA)?:
The provided information does not specify any direct impact of this vulnerability on compliance with common standards and regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA.