CVE-2026-9411
SQL Injection in Indian Invoicing System
Publication date: 2026-05-25
Last updated on: 2026-05-25
Assigner: VulDB
Description
Description
CVSS Scores
EPSS Scores
| Probability: | |
| Percentile: |
Meta Information
Affected Vendors & Products
| Vendor | Product | Version / Range |
|---|---|---|
| sourcecodester | indian_invoicing_system | 1.0 |
Helpful Resources
Exploitability
| CWE ID | Description |
|---|---|
| CWE-89 | The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data. |
| CWE-74 | The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component. |
Attack-Flow Graph
AI Powered Q&A
Can you explain this vulnerability to me?
This vulnerability exists in the SourceCodester Indian Invoicing System 1.0, specifically in the Invoice Generation Handler component within the file /Invoicing/IGST_Invoice.php.
It occurs due to improper processing of the arguments customer_name or category, which allows an attacker to perform SQL injection.
This means an attacker can manipulate these inputs to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the database.
The attack can be initiated remotely, and the exploit has been made public.
How can this vulnerability impact me? :
An attacker exploiting this SQL injection vulnerability could potentially access, modify, or delete sensitive data stored in the database.
This could lead to unauthorized disclosure of customer information, data corruption, or disruption of the invoicing system's normal operations.
Since the attack can be performed remotely, it increases the risk of exploitation without physical access.