CVE-2026-12616
Received Received - Intake

Log Injection in PIA Authentication Broker

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-12616, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-06-29

Last updated on: 2026-06-29

Assigner: Eclipse Foundation

Description

The /v1/upload/sbom endpoint extracts the iss claim from the attacker-supplied JWT with signature verification disabled, then interpolates that string into three log statements before any validation gate. Because the configured log format ("%(asctime)s - %(name)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s") renders newlines literally, an unauthenticated attacker can forge log records that are byte-for-byte indistinguishable from PIA's genuine "Successfully authenticated project" message. PIA is an authentication broker whose logs are explicitly relied upon for incident response (DESIGN.md Β§5.4 lists "Token verifications" and "Errors" as events to log), so the ability to plant fake auth-success entries directly undermines the audit trail the service exists to produce.

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-06-29
Last Modified
2026-06-29
Generated
2026-06-29
AI Q&A
2026-06-29
EPSS Evaluated
N/A
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
eclipse pia to 0.2.1 (exc)

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-117 The product constructs a log message from external input, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements when the message is written to a log file.

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This vulnerability (CVE-2026-12616) affects the Eclipse CSI - PIA project, specifically the /v1/upload/sbom endpoint. The endpoint extracts the 'iss' claim from a JWT token without verifying its signature and inserts this value directly into log statements. Because the log format renders newlines literally, an unauthenticated attacker can inject specially crafted strings that create fake log entries indistinguishable from legitimate authentication success messages.

This log injection undermines the integrity of the audit logs, which are relied upon for incident response and security monitoring.

Compliance Impact

This vulnerability undermines the integrity of audit logs by allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject forged log entries that appear identical to legitimate authentication success messages.

Since audit logs are critical for incident response and forensic investigations, this log injection flaw can impair the ability to reliably track and verify authentication events.

As a result, organizations using the affected software may face challenges in meeting compliance requirements for standards such as GDPR and HIPAA, which mandate accurate and tamper-evident logging for security monitoring and incident response.

Impact Analysis

The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge log entries that appear as genuine authentication success messages. This compromises the reliability of audit logs, making it difficult or impossible to trust the recorded events.

As a result, incident response efforts can be misled or obstructed, potentially allowing attackers to hide their activities or create confusion during security investigations.

Detection Guidance

Detection of this vulnerability involves monitoring the logs generated by the /v1/upload/sbom endpoint for suspicious or forged log entries that mimic legitimate authentication success messages.

Since the vulnerability allows an attacker to inject log entries that are byte-for-byte indistinguishable from genuine messages, detection requires careful inspection of logs for anomalies or unexpected patterns.

No specific commands or automated detection tools are provided in the available resources.

Mitigation Strategies

Immediate mitigation steps are not explicitly detailed in the provided resources.

However, general best practices would include disabling or restricting access to the vulnerable /v1/upload/sbom endpoint, validating JWT signatures before processing, and sanitizing log inputs to prevent injection.

Updating to a fixed version of the software once available is also recommended.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-12616. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart