CVE-2026-17350
Received Received - Intake

Inconsistent Tool Permission Enforcement in pgAdmin 4

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-17350, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-07-31

Last updated on: 2026-07-31

Assigner: PostgreSQL

Description

The per-tool permission system (custom roles / role-based tool permissions, introduced in pgAdmin 4 9.3) did not enforce its permission check consistently. In SERVER mode, pgAdmin 4 gates each tool behind a per-tool Flask-Security permission, but the permission decorator (permissions_required) was applied only to a single "front door" route per tool. Every other backend route and Socket.IO handler in that tool's workflow relied solely on pga_login_required/socket_login_required, which check authentication but not the tool permission. The reporter verified three cases against a test build: (1) a user without tools_query_tool permission received 403 on the protected sqleditor initialization route, but the same session went on to connect the server, initialize the viewdata backend chain, and retrieve real table row content; (2) a user without tools_grant_wizard received 403 on the protected acl route, but the same session still enumerated grantable objects, generated GRANT SQL, and successfully applied it -- confirmed database-side via has_table_privilege(); (3) a user without tools_schema_diff received 403 on the protected panel route, but the same session initialized schema diff, enumerated and connected databases, and obtained real DDL differences via the compare_database Socket.IO handler. The reporter also confirmed a related but distinct issue: a non-owner triggering /misc/workspace/adhoc_connect_server against an administrator-owned shared server caused pgAdmin to persist a new server row still owned by the administrator (user_id/shared unchanged from the source), even though the connection attempt itself reported failure. During remediation, the same front-door-only permission gap was found to also affect the ERD, PSQL, and Debugger tools, and the Backup, Restore, Maintenance, and Import/Export blueprints, none of which were part of the original report; these were fixed using the same pattern as an extension of the reported defect class. An authenticated user who had valid pgAdmin login and a stored, working database connection, but had been explicitly denied a specific tool's permission by an administrator, could therefore still drive that tool end-to-end through its other routes and sockets, including obtaining an interactive psql session over the /pty Socket.IO namespace and invoking backup/restore/maintenance/import-export jobs. Because the bypass only restores access to tools operating over the user's own already-authenticated database connection, it does not grant the user any database privilege they did not already hold; it circumvents pgAdmin's own tool-level access-control policy (an organisational segregation-of-duties control, separate from database-level authorization), letting a user reach a pgAdmin feature an administrator intended to withhold from them, using capabilities their existing database role already permits through other means. Socket.IO event handlers had no permission-aware equivalent of permissions_required; only socket_login_required existed, checking authentication but not the tool permission. Fix adds a socket_permissions_required decorator (mirroring permissions_required, honouring the Administrator bypass, reading permissions via has_permission()) and applies it, alongside permissions_required, as the outermost decorator on every backend route and Socket.IO handler for the affected tools. Regression tests assert 403 on every gated route and socket handler for a permission-less user. This issue affects pgAdmin 4 in SERVER mode: from 9.3 before 9.17.

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-07-31
Last Modified
2026-07-31
Generated
2026-07-31
AI Q&A
2026-07-31
EPSS Evaluated
N/A
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
pgadmin pgadmin to 9.17 (exc)

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-862 The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This vulnerability in pgAdmin 4 (versions 9.3 to 9.17) involves a permission system flaw where tool-specific access controls were not consistently enforced. While some routes required tool permissions, others relied only on authentication checks, allowing users to bypass intended restrictions and access tools they were explicitly denied.

Detection Guidance

This vulnerability involves improper permission checks in pgAdmin 4's tool access system. To detect it, verify if users with restricted tool permissions can still access those tools through alternative routes or Socket.IO handlers. Check pgAdmin logs for unauthorized access attempts to tool-specific endpoints or socket events. Ensure all tool-related routes and handlers enforce the permissions_required decorator.

Impact Analysis

An authenticated user with a valid database connection but restricted tool permissions could still use those tools through alternative routes or Socket.IO handlers. This includes accessing interactive sessions, generating SQL, or performing backup/restore operations, bypassing organizational access controls.

Compliance Impact

This vulnerability undermines compliance with standards requiring segregation of duties (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) by allowing users to bypass pgAdmin's tool-level access controls. Administrators may intend to restrict certain database tools (e.g., query editors, backup tools) from specific users, but the flaw enables unauthorized access to these tools through alternative routes, potentially violating access control policies mandated by these regulations.

Mitigation Strategies

Upgrade pgAdmin 4 to version 9.17 or later to apply the fix. Ensure all affected tools (e.g., Query Tool, ERD, PSQL, Backup, Restore) are updated. Review and enforce tool-level permissions for all users. Monitor for any unauthorized access attempts post-upgrade.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-17350. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart