CVE-2026-72247
Received Received - Intake

BaseFortify

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-72247, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-08-15

Last updated on: 2026-08-15

Assigner: kernel.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conncount: fix zone comparison in tuple dedup The "already exists" dedup logic in __nf_conncount_add() decides whether a connection has already been counted and can be skipped instead of incrementing the connlimit count. It compares the conntrack zone of a list entry with the zone of the connection being added using nf_ct_zone_id() and nf_ct_zone_equal(), passing conn->zone.dir or zone->dir as the direction argument. Those helpers take enum ip_conntrack_dir values: IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL is 0 and IP_CT_DIR_REPLY is 1. However, zone->dir is a u8 bitmask: NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_ORIG is 1, NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_REPL is 2 and NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR is 3. Passing that bitmask as the enum direction shifts the meaning of every non-zero value. An ORIG-only zone passes 1 and is tested as REPLY, while REPL-only and default zones pass 2 or 3 and test bits beyond the valid direction range. In those cases nf_ct_zone_id() can fall back to NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_ID instead of using the real zone id, so different zones can be treated as equal and dedup collapses to tuple equality alone. nf_conncount stores and compares the original-direction tuple for a connection. If an skb already has an attached conntrack entry, get_ct_or_tuple_from_skb() explicitly copies ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple, regardless of the packet's ctinfo. Therefore the zone comparison in the tuple dedup path must use IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL as well; the zone direction bitmask describes where a zone id applies, not which direction this conncount tuple represents. Fix the two dedup comparisons by passing IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL directly. Do not special-case NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_DIR and do not compare raw zone ids: using the existing helpers with IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL preserves the direction-aware NF_CT_DEFAULT_ZONE_ID fallback. A default bidirectional zone contains the ORIG bit, so it naturally returns the real zone id; reply-only zones continue to fall back for original-direction tuple comparisons.

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-08-15
Last Modified
2026-08-15
Generated
2026-08-15
AI Q&A
2026-08-15
EPSS Evaluated
N/A
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
linux_kernel linux_kernel *

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-UNKNOWN

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This vulnerability in the Linux kernel involves a flaw in the netfilter connection tracking system. The issue occurs in the nf_conncount module where zone comparison logic incorrectly handles direction values during tuple deduplication. This causes different network zones to be treated as equal, potentially leading to incorrect connection tracking and bypassing connection limits.

Detection Guidance

This vulnerability is specific to the Linux kernel's netfilter connection tracking system. Detection primarily involves checking the kernel version and verifying if the affected code paths are present. Use uname -a to check your kernel version and grep for the affected functions in the kernel source or running system.

Impact Analysis

This vulnerability could allow attackers to bypass connection limits enforced by the firewall, potentially leading to resource exhaustion or denial of service. It may also enable unauthorized network access by circumventing zone-based security policies that rely on proper connection tracking.

Mitigation Strategies

Apply the latest kernel security updates from your Linux distribution. If no patch is available, consider temporarily disabling the affected netfilter modules or restricting network traffic through firewall rules until an update is applied.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-72247. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart