CVE-2026-74658
Received Received - Intake

Race Condition in Linux Kernel Futex Mechanism

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-74658, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-08-22

Last updated on: 2026-08-22

Assigner: kernel.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Prevent robust futex exit race some more A robust futex unlock stores 0 over the whole futex value - wiping FUTEX_WAITERS - and wakes a single waiter. That wakeup is a one-shot notification: the protocol relies on its recipient to either acquire the futex (and eventually unlock while aware of the remaining contention) or re-arm FUTEX_WAITERS before sleeping again. If the woken waiter is killed before it can do either, the kernel must jump in and wake the next task down the line. This is a known complication of the futex protocol with a previous partial fix in commit ca16d5bee598 ("futex: Prevent robust futex exit race"). Unfortunately, that fix is insufficient. If a third task re-acquired the futex through the uncontended fast path in the meantime, the notification is lost: robust exit processing sees that it is owned by another task and does nothing, while the new owner sees no FUTEX_WAITERS when it unlocks and wakes nobody. The remaining waiters sleep forever behind a free futex: A owns the futex, B and C sleep in FUTEX_WAIT uval == A | FUTEX_WAITERS A robust unlock: store 0, FUTEX_WAKE(1) wakes B uval == 0 D fast path acquire: cmpxchg(0 -> D) uval == D, no FUTEX_WAITERS B killed before acting on the wakeup B exit walk, pending op: owner D != B -> no action D unlock: no FUTEX_WAITERS -> no wake C sleeps forever This is clearly a shortcoming in the implementation, which fails to keep the FUTEX_WAITERS bit consistent. Work around this by augmenting the robust list exit processing to also perform the extra wakeup if the futex word is owned by another thread but FUTEX_WAITERS is not set. This does not fix the problem of a non-contended take over/release and free sequence, which has been discussed for years and has been addressed by commit 3ca9595d9fb6 ("futex: Add support for unlocking robust futexes") and subsequent changes, but failed to take the problem described above into account. A more complete solution which is based on the in kernel unlock of contended robust futexes has been discussed in the context of this change and should show up in mainline sooner than later. [ tglx: Amend change log slightly and fixup coding style ]

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-08-22
Last Modified
2026-08-22
Generated
2026-08-22
AI Q&A
2026-08-22
EPSS Evaluated
N/A
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
linux linux_kernel *

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-UNKNOWN

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This is a race condition in the Linux kernel's futex (fast userspace mutex) implementation. When a robust futex is unlocked, it may fail to wake up waiting threads if another thread acquires the futex in the meantime. This leaves some threads sleeping forever behind a free futex.

Detection Guidance

This vulnerability is specific to the Linux kernel's futex implementation and requires kernel-level inspection. Detection involves checking kernel logs for futex-related errors or hangs, particularly during robust futex operations. Commands like dmesg or journalctl may show kernel warnings. However, no direct detection commands are provided in the CVE details.

Impact Analysis

This could cause applications to hang indefinitely if they rely on futex-based synchronization. Programs waiting for a lock may never proceed, leading to system freezes or crashes in affected software.

Mitigation Strategies

Apply the latest kernel patches from your Linux distribution to resolve the futex race condition. Monitor kernel updates closely as a more complete solution is expected in mainline kernels. No immediate workaround is suggested beyond patching.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-74658. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart