CVE-2026-78329
Received Received - Intake

Improper Input Validation in Apache Camel Undertow Component

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-78329, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-08-24

Last updated on: 2026-08-24

Assigner: Apache Software Foundation

Description

Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel Undertow component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.11.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. UndertowEndpoint defaulted its headerFilterStrategy field to the base HttpHeaderFilterStrategy and pushed that instance into the UndertowHttpBinding it creates lazily, overwriting the UndertowHeaderFilterStrategy that DefaultUndertowHttpBinding installs in its own constructor. Unless a deployment supplied a custom binding or an explicit headerFilterStrategy, the undertow-specific filtering therefore never executed on endpoint-configured routes: the strategy object was constructed and immediately replaced before it could be consulted. The consequence is that the legacy websocket. Exchange-header prefix was not filtered at the undertow transport boundary in either direction, so an undertow HTTP consumer mapped inbound wire headers of that form onto the Exchange, where an undertow WebSocket producer reads them as dispatch directives and can be made to deliver to a peer other than the one the route selected; and header names that undertow itself does not accept were mapped onto the Exchange rather than being skipped. Rest DSL consumers were never affected, because UndertowComponent assigns UndertowRestHeaderFilterStrategy explicitly, which extends the undertow strategy. This is not a regression of CVE-2025-30177: the base HttpHeaderFilterStrategy configures the inbound Camel-prefix filter itself, so the protection introduced by that advisory continued to work through the base class and was never lost. What the change did was leave the undertow strategy orphaned on the endpoint path, with the effect that two subsequent corrections written into it - one skipping header names undertow rejects, one filtering the legacy websocket. prefix in both directions - were applied to a class the endpoint no longer used and never took effect in the releases that shipped them. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, configure the strategy explicitly rather than relying on the default, for example by binding an UndertowHeaderFilterStrategy in the registry and referencing it on the endpoint as undertow:http://0.0.0.0:8080/foo?headerFilterStrategy=#myStrategy, and additionally strip the dispatch headers at the trust boundary with removeHeaders(β€œwebsocket.*”). Note a residual limitation that upgrading does not remove: the undertow component deliberately keeps the websocket. values as part of its externally visible API contract, and UndertowProducer reads them with in.getHeader, which does not consult a HeaderFilterStrategy at all. The restored filtering is therefore defence in depth at the undertow transport boundary only. A route that carries an untrusted message from a non-undertow consumer into an undertow producer is not protected by this fix and must strip those headers itself.

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-08-24
Last Modified
2026-08-24
Generated
2026-08-24
AI Q&A
2026-08-24
EPSS Evaluated
N/A
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 6 associated CPEs
Vendor Product Version / Range
apache camel 4.11.0
apache camel 4.14.9
apache camel 4.15.0
apache camel 4.18.4
apache camel 4.19.0
apache camel 4.22.0

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-20 The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This is an improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel's Undertow component. The UndertowEndpoint incorrectly replaces the undertow-specific header filter strategy with a base HTTP one, preventing proper filtering of headers. This allows legacy websocket.Exchange-header prefixes to bypass security checks and enables WebSocket producers to deliver messages to unintended recipients. The issue affects specific versions of Apache Camel and was fixed in later releases.

Detection Guidance

Detecting this vulnerability requires checking Apache Camel Undertow component versions and configuration. Verify installed versions with commands like 'camel --version' or check Maven/Gradle dependencies. Inspect Undertow endpoint configurations for missing headerFilterStrategy settings. Look for websocket.* headers in HTTP/WebSocket traffic that should have been filtered.

Impact Analysis

An attacker could exploit this to send messages to unintended peers via WebSocket, bypassing intended routing. Header names rejected by Undertow may also be incorrectly processed. This could lead to unauthorized data access, message interception, or misrouting of sensitive information in systems using affected Apache Camel versions.

Compliance Impact

This vulnerability could lead to unauthorized data exposure or interception, violating confidentiality requirements in GDPR and HIPAA. Failure to filter headers properly may result in non-compliance with data protection principles, potentially leading to regulatory penalties or breaches of trust.

Mitigation Strategies

Upgrade Apache Camel to fixed versions (4.14.9, 4.18.4, or 4.22.0). If immediate upgrade isn't possible, explicitly configure UndertowHeaderFilterStrategy on endpoints using 'headerFilterStrategy=#myStrategy' and add 'removeHeaders("websocket.*")' to strip problematic headers at trust boundaries.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-78329. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart