CVE-2026-102713
Awaiting Analysis Awaiting Analysis - Queue

Buffer Overflow in NetX Duo TFTP Server

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-102713, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-09-29

Last updated on: 2026-09-29

Assigner: Eclipse Foundation

Description

The TFTP server accepts a DATA datagram of any size. The dispatcher rejects datagrams shorter than four bytes (nxd_tftp_server.c:1037) and nothing anywhere checks an upper bound, in particular not against the protocol maximum of 4 + NX_TFTP_FILE_TRANSFER_MAX. Two things follow from that one missing check, both reachable before any authentication because TFTP has none. The handler passes `nx_packet_length - 4` straight to FileX: ```c /* addons/tftp/nxd_tftp_server.c:1863, 1889 */ status = nx_packet_copy(packet_ptr, &temp_ptr, server_ptr -> nx_tftp_server_packet_pool_ptr, NX_WAIT_FOREVER); ... fx_file_write(&(client_request_ptr -> nx_tftp_client_request_file), packet_ptr -> nx_packet_prepend_ptr + 4, packet_ptr -> nx_packet_length - 4); ``` `nx_packet_length` is the length of a chain, not of one contiguous buffer, so FileX copies past the end of the first packet: ``` ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow READ of size 1280 at 0x621000001108 thread T5 #0 __interceptor_memcpy #1 _fx_utility_memory_copy filex/common/src/fx_utility_memory_copy.c:78 0x621000001108 is 0 bytes to the right of 4104-byte region ``` Those bytes are written into the file the attacker is uploading, and a TFTP read request hands them back, so this is a memory disclosure with a convenient retrieval channel. The same datagram also wedges the server. `nx_packet_copy` at :1863 needs ceil(nx_packet_length / pool_payload) packets and asks for them with NX_WAIT_FOREVER, so when the attacker sizes the datagram beyond what the pool holds, the server thread suspends and never returns. A liveness probe after one such datagram times out with the pool at 0 of 12 packets and the server thread suspended, and no later client is served. Reject `nx_packet_length > 4 + NX_TFTP_FILE_TRANSFER_MAX` in the DATA branch before either call, and use a bounded wait rather than NX_WAIT_FOREVER for the copy.

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-09-29
Last Modified
2026-09-29
Generated
2026-09-29
AI Q&A
2026-09-29
EPSS Evaluated
N/A
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 2 associated CPEs
Vendor Product Version / Range
azure azure_tftp_server *
azure filex *

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-125 The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
CWE-770 The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This vulnerability involves a TFTP server that does not enforce an upper limit on the size of DATA datagrams. The server copies data from packets without checking if the size exceeds protocol limits, leading to heap buffer overflows. Attackers can exploit this to write arbitrary data into files and retrieve sensitive memory contents via TFTP read requests. The server may also crash or hang due to resource exhaustion.

Impact Analysis

An attacker could exploit this to read sensitive memory from the server, potentially exposing confidential data. The server may become unresponsive or crash, disrupting services. Since TFTP lacks authentication, any remote attacker can exploit this without credentials.

Mitigation Strategies

Update the TFTP server to a patched version that includes a check for nx_packet_length > 4 + NX_TFTP_FILE_TRANSFER_MAX in the DATA branch. Replace NX_WAIT_FOREVER with a bounded wait during nx_packet_copy to prevent server wedging.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-102713. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart