CVE-2026-93241
Received Received - Intake

Memory Reclaim Bypass in Linux Kernel OOM Handling

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-93241, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-09-24

Last updated on: 2026-09-24

Assigner: kernel.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: memcg: bypass the reclaim and oom killer for dying tasks once oom_reaper is done At Meta, we are seeing instances where an OOM killed job is stuck in the exit path for several hours. In one particular case, the job was stuck for more than 8 hours and I had to manually remove the memory.max limits to allow the process to exit. The job was a single process job and had ~55 GiB memory.max and zswap enabled. It had almost 0 anon in memory and ~111 GiB in zswap compressed to ~51 GiB zswap pool (i.e. almost all of memory.current was zswap). Nothing was left on the LRUs to reclaim. On further inspection, I observed ~20k threads of that process stuck with the following stack: [<0>] mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0x4e/0xa0 [<0>] charge_memcg+0x8bf/0x990 [<0>] mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio+0x4e/0x80 [<0>] __read_swap_cache_async+0x10c/0x260 [<0>] swapin_readahead+0x116/0x3f0 [<0>] do_swap_page+0x13c/0x1ce0 [<0>] handle_mm_fault+0x61d/0x11f0 [<0>] do_user_addr_fault+0x3e7/0x6d0 [<0>] exc_page_fault+0x8f/0x110 [<0>] asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 [<0>] __get_user_8+0x14/0x20 [<0>] futex_cleanup+0x27/0x1c0 [<0>] futex_exit_release+0x47/0x60 [<0>] do_exit+0x107/0x940 [<0>] do_group_exit+0x81/0xa0 [<0>] get_signal+0x2b1/0x6e0 [<0>] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x1a/0x1c0 [<0>] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xa8/0x1c0 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x152/0x250 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 In addition the dmesg was filled with "Out of memory and no killable processes..." messages. I have no idea why oom reaper was not able to reap/unmap the process. My guess is that since oom reaper tries to acquire mmap_lock in read mode limited number of times and then gives up, there might be a thread of that process which had mmap_lock in write mode at that time. My initial suspicion was the futex_cleanup and kernel page fault causing infinite fault and charge retries but that was put to rest in previous discussions happened on similar problem [1]. My current theory is that it is just a simple slow serialization behind the oom_lock. Unlike page allocator, memcg charge code takes the oom_lock without the "try". Though memcg oom code uses mutex_lock_killable(), note that in the call stack get_signal() consumes SIGKILL (or sigdelset(SIGKILL)) before calling do_group_exit(). So this mutex_lock_killable() is just a mutex_lock() here. Therefore 10s of thousands of threads are waiting on oom_lock and one by one they get -EFAULT from get_user() in the futex cleanup code and bails out. Discussion from [1] led to commit a75ffa26122b ("memcg, oom: do not bypass oom killer for dying tasks") which routes dying tasks into the OOM path precisely so the oom_reaper can reap their mm and free the memory asynchronously. But the reaper is best-effort and one-shot: if it cannot take mmap_lock for read (e.g. a sibling thread holds it for write) it sets MMF_OOM_SKIP and never retries, leaving only the glacial oom_lock-serialized synchronous drain. Once MMF_OOM_SKIP is set there is no more asynchronous reclaim coming for the mm, so a dying task charging against it has nothing left to wait for: it frees its memory only once it finishes exiting. Running reclaim and the (no-victim) OOM killer for it is then pointless, and doing it for 10s of thousands of exiting threads is what serializes them behind oom_lock. So before reclaim, if current is an OOM victim whose reaper is done, fail the charge. Reproduced with 20k threads, each parking a robust futex head on its own zswapped page, OOM-group-killed while a sibling holds mmap_lock for write so the reaper gives up and sets MMF_OOM_SKIP. Tested on next-20260728 and baseline show ~90 seconds exit time while with the patch the exit time reduced to ~3 seconds.

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-09-24
Last Modified
2026-09-24
Generated
2026-09-25
AI Q&A
2026-09-24
EPSS Evaluated
N/A
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
linux linux_kernel *

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-UNKNOWN

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This vulnerability in the Linux kernel involves a memory management issue where Out-of-Memory (OOM) killed tasks get stuck in the exit path for extended periods, sometimes hours. The problem occurs when the OOM reaper fails to reclaim memory from dying tasks, leaving thousands of threads waiting indefinitely behind a lock. The root cause appears to be a serialization issue with the oom_lock, where threads cannot proceed due to a sibling thread holding a write lock on mmap_lock, preventing the reaper from completing its task.

Detection Guidance

This vulnerability manifests as processes stuck in the exit path for extended periods, particularly when memory.max limits are set and zswap is enabled. Check for processes with high memory usage and long exit times using commands like 'ps aux --sort=-etime' or 'top'. Look for 'Out of memory and no killable processes' messages in dmesg with 'dmesg | grep -i "out of memory"'.

Impact Analysis

This vulnerability can cause severe performance degradation and system instability. Affected systems may experience prolonged unresponsiveness, as processes stuck in the exit path consume system resources. In extreme cases, manual intervention (e.g., removing memory limits) may be required to restore normal operation. Systems with high memory pressure or zswap enabled are particularly vulnerable.

Compliance Impact

This vulnerability does not directly affect compliance with GDPR or HIPAA as it pertains to memory management in the Linux kernel. It may indirectly impact availability of systems, which could affect service-level agreements but does not involve data breaches or unauthorized access.

Mitigation Strategies

Apply the kernel patch that bypasses reclaim and OOM killer for dying tasks once oom_reaper completes. Temporarily remove memory.max limits for stuck processes to allow normal exit. Monitor dmesg for OOM messages and check process exit times to verify mitigation.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-93241. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart