CVE-2026-98151
Received Received - Intake

REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION in Linux Kernel BPF

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-98151, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-09-25

Last updated on: 2026-09-25

Assigner: kernel.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION on speculative pointer arithmetic Take the following unprivileged program as an example: r0 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(...) /* PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, offset 0 */ ... 14: r0 += r1 /* r1 is a bounded scalar */ 15: r9 = r0 Loading it triggers a verifier warning from reg_bounds_sanity_check(): verifier bug: REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (alu): const subreg tnum out of sync with range bounds r64={.base=0x0, .size=0x0} r32={.base=0x0, .size=0xffffffff} var_off=(0x0, 0x0) What happens: 1. Processing insn 14 (r0 += r1) in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(), the new offset is computed into dst_reg's var_off and 32/64-bit ranges. 2. Because pointer registers do not track 32-bit subregister bounds, __mark_reg32_unbounded() first sets r32 to the full range; r32 is re-derived from the offset at the end of the function by reg_bounds_sync(). 3. On the unprivileged path, sanitize_ptr_alu() is called and, via sanitize_speculative_path() -> push_stack(), snapshots the current register state and schedules the next instruction (insn 15) to be verified directly as a speculative path. 4. That snapshot is taken between step 2 and the final reg_bounds_sync(): at this point dst_reg's var_off still holds the (const) original offset while r32 has just been blanked to the full range, i.e. the two are out of sync. When the speculative path later verifies insn 15 (r9 = r0), the inconsistent state reaches reg_bounds_sanity_check() and trips the warning. var_off and the 32-bit range must always be consistent. There are two ways to keep the snapshot consistent: 1. sync var_off and r32 before the snapshot so they match, or 2. leave r32 at its original (already consistent) value and blank it only after the snapshot. The whole point of sanitize_ptr_alu() is to insert a harmless masking sequence that keeps the access in bounds under speculation, so the state it snapshots should faithfully represent that. Take approach 2: move __mark_reg32_unbounded() to after sanitize_ptr_alu(), so the speculative snapshot keeps the pointer's original, consistent r32. The non-speculative path is unchanged: r32 is still blanked before the offset is applied and re-derived by reg_bounds_sync().

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-09-25
Last Modified
2026-09-25
Generated
2026-09-25
AI Q&A
2026-09-25
EPSS Evaluated
N/A
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
linux linux_kernel *

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-UNKNOWN

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This vulnerability in the Linux kernel involves a violation of register invariants during speculative pointer arithmetic in BPF (Berkeley Packet Filter) programs. It occurs when unprivileged programs perform pointer arithmetic that triggers a verifier warning due to inconsistent state between the pointer's offset and its 32-bit range bounds. The issue arises because the verifier's snapshot of register state for speculative execution captures an inconsistent state where the pointer's offset and 32-bit range are out of sync.

Detection Guidance

This vulnerability is specific to the Linux kernel's BPF (Berkeley Packet Filter) implementation and requires kernel-level inspection. Detection involves checking kernel logs for verifier warnings related to REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION or BPF-related errors. Use commands like dmesg | grep -i 'verifier bug' or journalctl -k | grep -i 'bpf' to search for relevant messages.

Impact Analysis

This vulnerability primarily affects systems running vulnerable Linux kernels where unprivileged users can load BPF programs. It could allow local attackers to bypass kernel security mechanisms by crafting malicious BPF programs that trigger the verifier bug, potentially leading to unauthorized memory access or privilege escalation. Systems not using BPF or running patched kernels are not affected.

Mitigation Strategies

Apply the latest kernel security patches from your Linux distribution to resolve the BPF verifier issue. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling unprivileged BPF access via sysctl kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled=1 or by setting the kernel parameter 'bpf_unprivileged=0' at boot.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-98151. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart