CVE-2026-105298
Awaiting Analysis Awaiting Analysis - Queue

HTTP/2 Host Header Confusion in Pingora

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-105298, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-10-20

Last updated on: 2026-10-20

Assigner: Cloudflare, Inc.

Description

Summary Before version 0.9.0, Pingora accepted HTTP/2 requests whose Host header differed from the :authority pseudo-header. Request filters, cache keys, and logs that read the request URI (session.req_header().uri) saw the :authority value, but the upstream received the client-supplied Host value. Pingora also accepted :authority values containing userinfo (for example, user@example.com). This violates RFC 9113 Section 8.3.1, which requires an intermediary to use the :authority value for Host and replace any existing Host field. Root cause * HTTP/2 to HTTP/1.1: Host was generated from :authority only when the request had no Host header, so a conflicting client Host was forwarded unchanged. * HTTP/2 to HTTP/2: the client Host header was removed and used to overwrite the upstream :authority, after request filters had already run against the original :authority. * The HTTP/2 server did not compare Host with :authority and did not reject userinfo in the authority. Impact A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a single HTTP/2 request that the application sees as one host and the upstream receives as another. Where request filters, access controls, or cache keys use the URI authority and the upstream routes by Host, this can lead to: * Cache poisoning: a response from another virtual host is stored under the victim host's cache key and served to other users (this also requires the upstream to serve different content per Host). * Host-based access control bypass: a request approved for one host is served by a different virtual host on the upstream. Deployments that do not accept HTTP/2 from clients, or that do not use the request authority for security or caching decisions, are not affected. Note that Cloudflare CDN customers were unaffected, as internal Pingora services at Cloudflare do not have HTTP/2 clients. Mitigation: * Upgrade to pingora 0.9.0 or later. Pingora now returns 400 Bad Request for HTTP/2 requests whose Host differs from :authority, that contain more than one Host, or whose authority contains userinfo, and keeps the upstream Host or :authority consistent with the request authority. Fix commits: https://github.com/cloudflare/pingora/commit/915590a91811877795531f6ba0927a3138b5cb4b , https://github.com/cloudflare/pingora/commit/ffab8302d08d4292d1924eb8fe84647fd5cb8e76 * If you cannot upgrade: in request_filter, reject HTTP/2 requests that carry a Host header different from the URI authority, or whose authority contains '@'.

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-10-20
Last Modified
2026-10-20
Generated
2026-11-09
AI Q&A
2026-10-20
EPSS Evaluated
2026-11-07
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 1 associated CPE
Vendor Product Version / Range
Cloudflare https://github.com/cloudflare/pingora 0.1.0

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-444 The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination.

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
Executive Summary

This vulnerability in Pingora before version 0.9.0 involves HTTP/2 requests where the Host header differs from the :authority pseudo-header. The application sees one host while the upstream receives another, violating RFC 9113. It also allows userinfo in the authority, which should not be permitted.

Detection Guidance

To detect this vulnerability, inspect HTTP/2 requests for mismatches between the Host header and the :authority pseudo-header. Check logs or request filters for requests where the Host header differs from the URI authority. Use tools like Wireshark or tcpdump to capture and analyze HTTP/2 traffic for such inconsistencies.

Impact Analysis
  • Cache poisoning: responses from one host may be stored under another host's cache key and served to users.
  • Access control bypass: requests approved for one host may be served by a different virtual host on the upstream.
Compliance Impact

This vulnerability could lead to cache poisoning or host-based access control bypass, potentially exposing sensitive data to unauthorized parties. For GDPR, this may violate principles of data confidentiality and integrity. For HIPAA, it could result in unauthorized access to protected health information if exploited in healthcare environments.

Mitigation Strategies
  • Upgrade Pingora to version 0.9.0 or later to enforce RFC 9113 compliance and reject invalid requests.
  • If upgrading is not possible, implement a request filter to reject HTTP/2 requests with a Host header different from the URI authority or containing userinfo (e.g., user@example.com).

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-105298. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart

Security Radar

News mentioning this vulnerability
Loading related security news...