CVE-2026-98955
Received Received - Intake

Flow dissector u16 truncation flaw in Linux kernel

Vulnerability report for CVE-2026-98955, including description, CVSS score, EPSS score, affected products, exploitability, helpful resources, and attack-flow context.

Publication date: 2026-10-23

Last updated on: 2026-10-23

Assigner: kernel.org

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: flow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of skb->len when computing thoff __skb_flow_dissect() computes key_control->thoff using: key_control->thoff = min_t(u16, nhoff, skb ? skb->len : hlen); min_t(u16, ...) casts both arguments to u16 before comparing them. Whenever skb->len (or hlen) modulo 65536 is smaller than nhoff, the truncated length wins and thoff is set to a bogus small value, even when the dissection succeeded. For example, an IPv4/TCP frame with skb->len == 65540 and nhoff == 34 gets thoff == 4, so callers such as skb_probe_transport_header() point the transport header inside the Ethernet header. Such skbs are not exotic: - At the time of commit d0c081b49137 ("flow_dissector: properly cap thoff field"), AF_PACKET with PACKET_VNET_HDR could already build GSO skbs larger than 64KB (MTU checks are skipped for GSO, and alloc_skb_with_frags() accepted up to MAX_SKB_FRAGS (17) order-0 pages on top of the linear part). - BIG TCP now makes skbs larger than 64KB common. - The following patch makes tun_get_user() dissect IFF_TAP frames before eth_type_trans() pulls the Ethernet header, so a GSO frame carrying a 65522..65535 byte L3 packet will be dissected with skb->len in [65536, 65549]. Compare as u32 instead. If the resulting offset cannot be represented in the u16 key_control->thoff, cap it to U16_MAX and report the dissection as failed rather than silently returning a wrong transport offset. thoff is still set on failure, as some callers (such as eth_get_headlen()) use it regardless of the return value.

CVSS Scores

EPSS Scores

Probability:
Percentile:

Meta Information

Published
2026-10-23
Last Modified
2026-10-23
Generated
2026-10-23
EPSS Evaluated
N/A
NVD
EUVD

Affected Vendors & Products

Showing 12 associated CPEs
Vendor Product Version / Range
Linux Linux d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5
Linux Linux d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5
Linux Linux d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5
Linux Linux d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5
Linux Linux d0c081b49137cd3200f2023c0875723be66e7ce5
Linux Linux d35cd5e279881ec36ff8cd82a2d9caebc0cce3fc
Linux Linux eecfa2eeefe3caef4c8d6b2284f6066c76ab26a1
Linux Linux 80f327285cab6ab8e10c3ea03278add5dd99fb02
Linux Linux 4.4.114
Linux Linux 4.9.79
Linux Linux 4.14.16
Linux Linux 4.15

Helpful Resources

Exploitability

CWE
CWE Icon
KEV
KEV Icon
CWE ID Description
CWE-UNKNOWN

Attack-Flow Graph

AI Quick Actions

Instant insights powered by AI
AI Quick Actions have not been generated yet.

Chat Assistant

Ask questions about this CVE
Hi! I’m here to help you understand CVE-2026-98955. Ask me anything about the vulnerability, its impact, or mitigation strategies.
0/70

EPSS Chart